Every day great ideas fade because turning complex thinking into clear communication takes time most people do not have.

Pressmaster.ai changes that. It captures how you think, amplifies it into powerful communication, and shares it in your authentic voice.

This is not about writing faster. It is about thinking louder.

Join us on October 15 at 12 PM ET or 6 PM CET for The Worlds First AI Built for Cognitive Amplification.

Discover how one short conversation becomes thirty days of strategic and market ready content.

Be part of the launch of a new category where AI becomes part of your cognitive architecture.

Save Your Free Spot

Here's a tale of two artists, both legendary in their fields: 

- Jean Giraud (Moebius) created groundbreaking science fiction comics in France, owned his IP completely, and built generational wealth that continues benefiting his estate today.

- Meanwhile, Jack Kirby co-created the Fantastic Four, X-Men, Avengers, and dozens of Marvel's most valuable characters and died in relative poverty, with his family receiving nothing from the billions those characters generated.

The difference wasn't talent. It wasn't work ethic. It wasn't even commercial success. 

The difference was the publishing model: European bande dessinée versus American work-for-hire.

One system treats creators as artists who own their work. 

The other treats them as contractors who own nothing. 

The wealth outcomes speak for themselves.

In France and Belgium, comic creators are treated exactly like book authors - because that's what they are. The system is built on a fundamental principle: the creator owns their work, period.

Creator Retains Full IP:

The artist/writer owns 100% of the intellectual property they create. Characters, storylines, world-building - all remain the creator's property in perpetuity.

Publisher as Distributor:

Publishers provide editorial support, printing, distribution, and marketing. In exchange, they receive a distribution fee, typically 10-25% of net sales, not ownership.

Revenue Sharing:

Standard industry practice

Long-Term Rights Reversion:

Even if a publisher initially licenses exclusive publication rights, those rights typically revert to creators after set periods (10-20 years) or can be renegotiated with leverage.

Hergé and The Adventures of Tintin

When Spielberg's "Adventures of Tintin" film grossed $374 million globally in 2011, Hergé's estate received substantial licensing fees - the opposite of American work-for-hire where creators get nothing from adaptations.

Jean Giraud (Moebius)

Giraud died in 2012, having built substantial wealth and leaving his family secure. His influence on science fiction art remains incalculable, and his estate continues profiting from his legacy.

René Goscinny and Albert Uderzo (Asterix)

The Asterix series demonstrates the wealth-building power of creator ownership:

When Uderzo sold his publishing company in 2008, the deal was worth €115 million - that's wealth built entirely because creators owned their IP.

The contrast with American comic creators couldn't be more stark or depressing.

Jack Kirby co-created or designed:

Kirby's compensation: Page rates. 

That's it. No ownership, no royalties, no participation in adaptations. He died in 1994 with modest savings, having spent years fighting Marvel just to get his original artwork returned.

His family sued Marvel for creator rights and eventually settled in 2014 - 20 years after his death - for an undisclosed amount rumored to be relatively modest compared to the character values.

The creators of Superman sold their rights to DC Comics in 1938 for $130 (roughly $2,800 in 2024 dollars). Superman has since generated billions. The creators:

Shuster died in 1992, Siegel in 1996 - both without significant wealth despite creating one of the most valuable IPs in entertainment history.

Co-creator of Spider-Man and Doctor Strange, Ditko left Marvel in 1966 over disputes about credit and compensation. He spent the rest of his career:

Spider-Man alone has generated over $10 billion in film revenue. Ditko's estate received standard work-for-hire compensation: nothing beyond original page rates.

American publishers built their business on work-for-hire contracts that transfer all rights to the corporation.

The Marvel/DC Standard Contract:

Why This Exists:

American comics emerged from pulp magazine publishing, which used work-for-hire extensively. When superheroes took off in 1930s-1940s, publishers realized the value and locked down ownership aggressively.

European publishers came from book publishing traditions that respected author rights. Comics were treated as literature, not disposable pulp entertainment.

The Economic Reality:

A Marvel writer earning $100/page for a 20-page story gets $2,000. If that story becomes the basis for a $1 billion film, that writer still has $2,000 - while the publisher captures 100% of the adaptation value.

A French bande dessinée creator selling 100,000 albums at €15 each, with 10% royalty, earns €150,000 ($165,000) from one album. If it's adapted to film, they negotiate separate licensing fees worth hundreds of thousands or millions.

European Approach: The Artist as Auteur

This creates direct creator-to-reader relationships that build sustainable careers. When Albert Uderzo or Moebius publishes something, their name sells it - giving them negotiating leverage and long-term brand value.

American Approach: The Corporate Assembly Line

Marvel/DC treat comics as corporate products:

This intentionally diminishes individual creator value, making them replaceable and reducing their leverage. When Batman gets a new creative team, the publisher wants readers to keep buying Batman - not follow the previous writer to their next project.

The Long-Term Consequence:

European creators build brands that outlast individual series. Moebius could move between publishers and projects, with his name ensuring sales. American creators become anonymous interchangeable parts in a corporate machine.

Image Comics: The American Exception

This model has worked: "The Walking Dead" creator Robert Kirkman built substantial wealth when the TV series became a hit. He retained ownership and participated in all adaptation revenue.

But Image represents a small fraction of American comics, and the Big Two (Marvel/DC) have shown zero interest in adopting creator-friendly terms.

Dark Horse, IDW, and Smaller Publishers:

Other publishers offer creator-ownership options, but typically with caveats:

These compromises are better than work-for-hire but still far from the European standard where creators simply own what they create and publishers simply distribute it.

The Honest Answer:

They don't have to. The system works perfectly - for them.

Corporate IP Value:

Disney bought Marvel for $4 billion in 2009. The MCU has since generated $30+ billion in box office revenue. That valuation and revenue stream depends on Disney owning the characters completely.

If Marvel operated like European publishers, Spider-Man rights would belong to Steve Ditko's estate. Disney couldn't have built the MCU without owning every character free and clear.

Creator Replaceability:

Work-for-hire ensures no individual creator becomes indispensable. If a writer demands better terms, publishers can replace them without losing character rights.

European publishers lose the series if the creator walks. Marvel doesn't lose Spider-Man if a writer quits - they just hire another writer.

Legal Precedent:

Decades of work-for-hire contracts create legal precedent that would be expensive and risky to overturn. Major publishers have legal departments specifically devoted to defending work-for-hire ownership.

For American Comic Creators:

The harsh reality is that working for Marvel/DC means accepting poverty wages and no ownership. The only paths to wealth are:

Many top American creators now view Marvel/DC as temporary career stepping stones, not long-term homes.

For European Creators:

The system works. Creators can build sustainable careers, accumulate wealth, and leave valuable estates. The trade-off is that failures are truly yours - if an album doesn't sell, you don't earn much.

For Indian Publishers and Creators:

India has the opportunity to choose which model to adopt. The temptation will be following the American work-for-hire model because it benefits publishers. But the European model has proven that respecting creator ownership builds healthier, more sustainable industries.

The European model proves that treating creators fairly builds wealth - for creators, publishers, and the industry. The American model proves that exploitation can generate billions for corporations while leaving creators in poverty.

These aren't accidental outcomes. They're the logical results of conscious choices about how to structure publisher-creator relationships.

For creators, the lesson is clear: ownership matters more than prestige. A creator-owned series that sells modestly can generate more long-term wealth than being the "definitive" writer on a major corporate character you don't own.

For the industry, the European model shows an alternative path that respects creators while building valuable, enduring properties. The American publishers won't voluntarily reform, but new publishers and platforms can choose differently.

For Indian creators and publishers, this is a chance to build an industry the right way from the start - one that creates generational wealth for artists, not just corporations.

Hey! Big moment for us at Mugafi today 🙌

We just launched Moksh: Origin I – The Quest — the first chapter of our own superhero universe.

It’s been in the works for years, and this is just the beginning… over 200 characters are coming soon ⚡

What makes it special is that you can actually be part of it...

Once you register, you'll get:

If you’ve ever loved superhero stories or just enjoy seeing new worlds come to life, I’d love for you to check it out ❤

👉 https://hprs.co/contest/4EYIeh